Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. CABELKA, 7:16-cv-00126-O-BP. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20170324k65 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2017
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED C. O'CONNOR , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate's recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings a
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate's recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Logsdon Farms, Inc., Chad Logsdon, and Billy Logsdon's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as moot, Amanda Slate's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 24) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as moot, and Defendant Larry Cabelka's claims against Logsdon Farms, Inc., Chad Logsdon, Billy Logsdon, and Amanda Slate are DISMISSED without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Rebecca Cabelka Thorpe's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 29) is DENIED.

The Clerk of Court is ordered to correct Larry Cabelka's designation in this case to reflect his party status as both the defendant and third-party plaintiff, instead of cross claimant, and correct Rebecca Cabelka Thorpe's designation to reflect her party status as a third-party defendant instead of a cross defendant.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer