MISKO v. BACKES, 3:16-CV-3080-M (BF). (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20170816847
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2017
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT BARBARA M.G. LYNN , Chief District Judge . The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney dated July 14, 2017. The Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objections were made.
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT BARBARA M.G. LYNN , Chief District Judge . The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney dated July 14, 2017. The Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objections were made. ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
BARBARA M.G. LYNN, Chief District Judge.
The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney dated July 14, 2017. The Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objections were made. The objections are overruled.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8] is DENIED.
The Court also denies Defendant's alternate Motion for More Definite Statement.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
