Filed: Sep. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. JOE FISH , Senior District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by petitioner. The district court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for pl
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. JOE FISH , Senior District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by petitioner. The district court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for pla..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A. JOE FISH, Senior District Judge.
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by petitioner. The district court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
The construed motion for preliminary injunction (docket entry 26) is therefore DENIED.
SO ORDERED.