Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SAM R. CUMMINGS , Senior District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on November 3, 2017, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation relate to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand, filed November 2, 2017. The Court has further reviewed Plaintiffs jive additional motions to remand that w
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SAM R. CUMMINGS , Senior District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on November 3, 2017, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation relate to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand, filed November 2, 2017. The Court has further reviewed Plaintiffs jive additional motions to remand that we..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SAM R. CUMMINGS, Senior District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on November 3, 2017, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation relate to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand, filed November 2, 2017.
The Court has further reviewed Plaintiffs jive additional motions to remand that were filed subsequent to the Magistrate's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. The Court views these subsequent motions to remand as objections. Likewise, the Court also considered Plaintiffs two specifically-titled objections filed subsequent to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation.
After a de novo review of all relevant matters and filings, the Court finds that Plaintiffs objections should be OVERRULED.
The Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are adopted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Therefore, the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand is DENIED. To the extent that the docket in the above-styled and -numbered civil action needs clarification, all pending "Motions to Remand" are denied and should be termed by the Clerk.
SO ORDERED.
