Mendez v. Davis, Director TDCJ-CID, 3:14-CV-2973-B. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180105b83
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JANE J. BOYLE , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED tha
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JANE J. BOYLE , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge.
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) the Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment based on the Court's denial of Petitioner's second motion for extension of time to file an appeal is DENIED; and (2) Petitioner's remaining claims are construed as filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and are TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1631.1 The Clerk's Office is directed to open a new civil action, nature of suit 530, with direct assignment to District Judge Boyle and Magistrate Judge Stickney and terminate the motion in this case.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. An order transferring a successive application to the court of appeals is not a final order requiring a certificate of appealability. See United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683, 688 (5th Cir. 2015).
Source: Leagle
