United States of America v. Cabelka, 7:16-cv-00126-O-BP. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180109a69
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED C. O'CONNOR , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the find
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED C. O'CONNOR , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the findi..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REED C. O'CONNOR, District Judge.
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Jared and Bonnie Cabelka's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 182) is GRANTED in part without prejudice to the extent it seeks dismissal under Rule 12(b)(5) or Rule 12(b)(6), and DENIED in part as MOOT to the extent it seeks dismissal under Rule 12(b)(2) and Rule 12(b)(4).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
