Williams v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, 3:17-CV-1973-K. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180214h10
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ED KINKEADE , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. A Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 59E With Objection to Magistrate Recommendation was filed by Plaintiff ( pro se) on January 29, 2018 (Doc. No. 22). The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to wh
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ED KINKEADE , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. A Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 59E With Objection to Magistrate Recommendation was filed by Plaintiff ( pro se) on January 29, 2018 (Doc. No. 22). The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to whi..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ED KINKEADE, District Judge.
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. A Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 59E With Objection to Magistrate Recommendation was filed by Plaintiff (pro se) on January 29, 2018 (Doc. No. 22). The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 59E With Objection to Magistrate Recommendation, is DENIED and the Objections are OVERRULED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss based on Rule 12(c) (Docs. 10 and 14) are GRANTED, and all claims against both defendants are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
