Moore v. Davis, 7:17-cv-100-O-BP. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180511e71
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 10, 2018
Latest Update: May 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED O'CONNOR , District Judge . This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 in which Petitioner challenges his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends that the petition be denied. ECF No. 20. Objections were filed by Petitioner and by Respondent. ECF Nos
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED O'CONNOR , District Judge . This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 in which Petitioner challenges his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends that the petition be denied. ECF No. 20. Objections were filed by Petitioner and by Respondent. ECF Nos...
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REED O'CONNOR, District Judge.
This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which Petitioner challenges his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends that the petition be denied. ECF No. 20. Objections were filed by Petitioner and by Respondent. ECF Nos. 21 & 22. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for denial set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
