Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hwidi v. Berryhill, 4:17-CV-0572-Y. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20180523h74 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 22, 2018
Latest Update: May 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TERRY R. MEANS , District Judge . On April 5, 2018, the United States magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation in this case (doc. 17). The report gave all parties fourteen days thereafter to serve and file with the Court written objections to the magistrate judge's proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation. No written objections have been filed. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415 , 1428-2
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

On April 5, 2018, the United States magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation in this case (doc. 17). The report gave all parties fourteen days thereafter to serve and file with the Court written objections to the magistrate judge's proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation. No written objections have been filed. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996). As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error and has found none.

Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Plaintiff's complaint is therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer