Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vetcher v. Sessions, 3:18-CV-1724-K (BH). (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20181019o01 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2018
Summary: RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ , Magistrate Judge . By Amended Miscellaneous Order No. 6 (adopted by Special Order No. 2-59 on May 5, 2005), before the Court is the movant's Motion to Proceed In Forma Paupers on appeal, received on October 2, 2018, in the Fifth Circuit and forwarded to this court (docs. 35, 36). (X) The request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be DENIED because the Court should ce
More

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

By Amended Miscellaneous Order No. 6 (adopted by Special Order No. 2-59 on May 5, 2005), before the Court is the movant's Motion to Proceed In Forma Paupers on appeal, received on October 2, 2018, in the Fifth Circuit and forwarded to this court (docs. 35, 36).

(X) The request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be DENIED because the Court should certify pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that the appeal is not taken in good faith and that the appeal presents no legal points of arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. If the Court denies the request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, the movant may challenge the denial by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, within thirty days after service of the notice required by Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4). See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer