U.S. v. Estrada, 2:17-CR-021-D. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20181119d00
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER SIDNEY A. FITZWATER , Senior District Judge . The government's October 22, 2018 motion for reduction in sentence is granted. * The court modifies its judgment filed on October 23, 2017 as follows. The judgment is modified at page 2 so that the portion of the sentence that reads: The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of: Forty-six (46) months as to count 2. is modified to read: The defendant is he
Summary: ORDER SIDNEY A. FITZWATER , Senior District Judge . The government's October 22, 2018 motion for reduction in sentence is granted. * The court modifies its judgment filed on October 23, 2017 as follows. The judgment is modified at page 2 so that the portion of the sentence that reads: The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of: Forty-six (46) months as to count 2. is modified to read: The defendant is her..
More
ORDER
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, Senior District Judge.
The government's October 22, 2018 motion for reduction in sentence is granted.* The court modifies its judgment filed on October 23, 2017 as follows.
The judgment is modified at page 2 so that the portion of the sentence that reads:
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of: Forty-six (46) months as to count 2.
is modified to read:
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of: Thirty-Four (34) months as to count 2.
In all other respects the original judgment and sentence of the court shall stand as entered.
The clerk of court shall provide copies of this memorandum opinion and order to the usual recipients, and shall also transmit a copy to the Bureau of Prisons.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
* The government requests, inter alia, that the order granting the motion be permanently sealed. The court concludes that the government's motion should be permanently sealed but that the court's order should be a public document.
Source: Leagle
