Brown v. Federal Express Corporation, 3:16-cv-01456-M. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190322g44
Visitors: 1
Filed: Mar. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARBARA M.G. LYNN , Chief District Judge . The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated February 15, 2019. The Court has further considered the Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 87), which the Court construes as Objections to the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. The Court has made a
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARBARA M.G. LYNN , Chief District Judge . The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated February 15, 2019. The Court has further considered the Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 87), which the Court construes as Objections to the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. The Court has made a ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
BARBARA M.G. LYNN, Chief District Judge.
The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated February 15, 2019. The Court has further considered the Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 87), which the Court construes as Objections to the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. The Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objections were made. The objections are overruled. Accordingly, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Federal Express Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 76) is GRANTED, the Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 87) is DENIED, and all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are DISMISSED with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
