Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Russell v. Texas, 3:19-cv-430-S-BN. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20190429885 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN GREN SCHOLER , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by Plaintiff Samuel T. Russell. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and reco
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by Plaintiff Samuel T. Russell. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff's motion for default judgment [Dkt. No. 8] is therefore DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer