McLaurin v. Office of the Attorney General, 4:19-cv-00044-P-BP. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190918c69
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK T. PITTMAN , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge Ray made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 11. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is ripe for review. The Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion t
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK T. PITTMAN , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge Ray made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 11. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is ripe for review. The Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion th..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MARK T. PITTMAN, District Judge.
The United States Magistrate Judge Ray made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 11. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is ripe for review. The Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Finding and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
