Barela v. Underwood, 3:18-CV-2353-G (BH). (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190925g46
Visitors: 27
Filed: Sep. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. JOE FISH , Senior District Judge . After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and concl
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. JOE FISH , Senior District Judge . After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclu..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A. JOE FISH, Senior District Judge.
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.
Defendants' motion to dismiss, filed December 3, 2018 (docket entry 14) is GRANTED. By separate judgment, all of the plaintiff's claims against the defendants will be DISMISSED with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
