ORDER

SAM R. CUMMINGS, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that Movant's Motion for Reconsideration should be granted in part and to the extent that the undersigned Senior United States District Judge consider the evidence presented at Movant's evidentiary hearing.1 Movant timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendations on December 9, 2019.

The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge's report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).

After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that Movant's objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court.2 For the reasons stated therein, the Court shall amend its original Order and Judgment to reflect that, after holding an evidentiary hearing, Movant has failed to satisfy his burden in demonstrating that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to the drug calculations as contained within the Presentence Report.

SO ORDERED.