Parsons v. Saul, 4:19-cv-00103-P-BP. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20200129g09
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK T. PITTMAN , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 23. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. The undersigned reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK T. PITTMAN , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 23. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. The undersigned reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MARK T. PITTMAN, District Judge.
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 23. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. The undersigned reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
