Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marisol G. v. Saul, 1:19-CV-125-C. (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20200213i51 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: ORDER SAM R. CUMMINGS , Senior District Judge . Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand should be granted pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as
More

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand should be granted pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand is GRANTED. Accordingly, this civil action is hereby REMANDED for further administrative proceedings.2

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. To protect privacy concerns of plaintiffs in social security cases, the undersigned identifies the Plaintiff only by first name and last initial.
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED AS MOOT.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer