ALPERT v. RILEY, H-04-3774. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20120118d83
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. After this court entered final judgment, Riley filed a Renewed Motion for Judgment or, in the Alternative, for New Trial. (Docket Entry No. 499). The motion is identical to an earlier motion Riley filed. ( See Docket Entry No. 468). This court denied the earlier motion in an August 8, 2011 Memorandum and Order. (Docket Entry No. 480). No change in law or new basis for relief is identified. The renewed motion is denied for the reasons stated in the Augus
Summary: ORDER LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. After this court entered final judgment, Riley filed a Renewed Motion for Judgment or, in the Alternative, for New Trial. (Docket Entry No. 499). The motion is identical to an earlier motion Riley filed. ( See Docket Entry No. 468). This court denied the earlier motion in an August 8, 2011 Memorandum and Order. (Docket Entry No. 480). No change in law or new basis for relief is identified. The renewed motion is denied for the reasons stated in the August..
More
ORDER
LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
After this court entered final judgment, Riley filed a Renewed Motion for Judgment or, in the Alternative, for New Trial. (Docket Entry No. 499). The motion is identical to an earlier motion Riley filed. (See Docket Entry No. 468). This court denied the earlier motion in an August 8, 2011 Memorandum and Order. (Docket Entry No. 480). No change in law or new basis for relief is identified. The renewed motion is denied for the reasons stated in the August 8, 2011 Memorandum and Order.
Source: Leagle
