MASITTA v. LABOR MAX STAFFING, 2:14-CV-00354. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20150908d61
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION NELVA GONZALES RAMOS , District Judge . On July 31, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his "Memorandum and Recommendation" (D.E. 19) recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution (D.E. 18) be granted. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-1
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION NELVA GONZALES RAMOS , District Judge . On July 31, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his "Memorandum and Recommendation" (D.E. 19) recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution (D.E. 18) be granted. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, District Judge.
On July 31, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his "Memorandum and Recommendation" (D.E. 19) recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution (D.E. 18) be granted. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 19), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution (D.E. 18) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
