Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

INTREPID SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC. v. OCEAN PROSPECTOR, Consolidated with G-12-cv-359. (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. Texas Number: infdco20160216c56 Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. FROESCHNER , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is "Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, Inc.'s Motion to Strike both PRC Environmental, Inc.'s (Dkt. 196) and Prospector Rig Mgt., LLC's (Dkt. 197) "Consolidated Reply in Support of Objections to Report and Recommendation as to Ownership of the Rig and Standing". Because Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure does not authorize the filing of a reply brief in support of objections to a pending Report and Recom
More

ORDER

Before the Court is "Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, Inc.'s Motion to Strike both PRC Environmental, Inc.'s (Dkt. 196) and Prospector Rig Mgt., LLC's (Dkt. 197) "Consolidated Reply in Support of Objections to Report and Recommendation as to Ownership of the Rig and Standing".

Because Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure does not authorize the filing of a reply brief in support of objections to a pending Report and Recommendation regarding a dispositive motion, Malin's Motion (Instrument no. 198) is GRANTED. See Cannon Partners, Ltd. v. Cape Cod Biolab Corp., 225 F.R.D. 247, 250 (N.D. Cal. 2003).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer