ROMERO v. HOUSTON GARDEN CENTER, 4:16-CV-935. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20170103727
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON , District Judge . Pending before the Court are Defendant's Motion to Extend Defendant's Deadline to File Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Doc. No. 38) and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Late Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Application for Attorney's Fees (Doc. No. 40). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 40) is DENIED. Plaintiffs may file a reply in support of their Moti
Summary: ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON , District Judge . Pending before the Court are Defendant's Motion to Extend Defendant's Deadline to File Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Doc. No. 38) and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Late Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Application for Attorney's Fees (Doc. No. 40). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 40) is DENIED. Plaintiffs may file a reply in support of their Motio..
More
ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant's Motion to Extend Defendant's Deadline to File Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Doc. No. 38) and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Late Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Application for Attorney's Fees (Doc. No. 40).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 40) is DENIED. Plaintiffs may file a reply in support of their Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Doc. No. 37) within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Defendant's Motion to Extend Deadline (Doc. No. 38) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
