RAHMAN v. FIESTA MART, LLC, H-15-2295. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20170103b04
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION OF PREJUDICIAL DISMISSAL GRAY H. MILLER , District Judge . In accordance with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), all parties to the above-styled and numbered action jointly stipulate to prejudicial dismissal of Plaintiff's claims based upon the following: Plaintiff and Defendant have consented to the request for prejudicial dismissal of all claims. All fees and expenses associated with this action shall be borne by the party incurring same, and neither pa
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION OF PREJUDICIAL DISMISSAL GRAY H. MILLER , District Judge . In accordance with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), all parties to the above-styled and numbered action jointly stipulate to prejudicial dismissal of Plaintiff's claims based upon the following: Plaintiff and Defendant have consented to the request for prejudicial dismissal of all claims. All fees and expenses associated with this action shall be borne by the party incurring same, and neither par..
More
JOINT STIPULATION OF PREJUDICIAL DISMISSAL
GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.
In accordance with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), all parties to the above-styled and numbered action jointly stipulate to prejudicial dismissal of Plaintiff's claims based upon the following:
Plaintiff and Defendant have consented to the request for prejudicial dismissal of all claims.
All fees and expenses associated with this action shall be borne by the party incurring same, and neither party is deemed a "prevailing party" in connection therewith.
Source: Leagle
