SENDEJAR v. CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL SYSTEM CORP., 2:17-CV-00201. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20170905h67
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE NELVA GONZALES RAMOS , District Judge . On August 16, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his "Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute" (D.E. 10). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No obj
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE NELVA GONZALES RAMOS , District Judge . On August 16, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his "Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute" (D.E. 10). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No obje..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, District Judge.
On August 16, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his "Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute" (D.E. 10). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 10), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 9) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
