Singletary v. State Of Texas, H-16-3476. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20171117g33
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRAY H. MILLER , District Judge . Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation ("M&R") entered by Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson on October 30, 2017. Dkt. 54. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing plaintiff Charleston Singletary's claims (Dkt. 11) for want of jurisdiction. Id. Singletary did not file any objections to the M&R. After reviewing the M&R, the various motions to dismiss, and the applicable law, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Singletar
Summary: ORDER GRAY H. MILLER , District Judge . Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation ("M&R") entered by Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson on October 30, 2017. Dkt. 54. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing plaintiff Charleston Singletary's claims (Dkt. 11) for want of jurisdiction. Id. Singletary did not file any objections to the M&R. After reviewing the M&R, the various motions to dismiss, and the applicable law, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Singletary..
More
ORDER
GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation ("M&R") entered by Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson on October 30, 2017. Dkt. 54. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing plaintiff Charleston Singletary's claims (Dkt. 11) for want of jurisdiction. Id. Singletary did not file any objections to the M&R. After reviewing the M&R, the various motions to dismiss, and the applicable law, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Singletary's claims should be dismissed. The court finds no clear error on the face of the record. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Comm. Note (1983). Accordingly, the M&R is ADOPTED IN FULL, and Singletary's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court will enter a final judgment consistent with this order.
Source: Leagle
