NANCY K. JOHNSON, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court are the following motions: Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Counterclaim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) (Doc. 111); Defendants' Renewed Motion to Strike Initial Disclosures (Doc. 128); Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Reply in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss First Amended Counterclaim (Doc. 130); Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (Doc. 133); Plaintiff's Motion for Reimbursement of Expert Fees (Doc. 136); Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Affirmative Defenses (Doc. 138); Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 143); Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Defendants' Rebuttal Experts (Doc. 142); and Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Doc. 149).
Plaintiff is a manufacturer and wholesaler of aftermarket automotive parts. Plaintiff claims it possesses common law and federal trademarks to its Universal Product Code number and that Defendants used those trademarks in advertising and selling their products. Plaintiff sues for false advertising and designation of origin, trademark infringement, unjust enrichment, negligent interference with contractual relations, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and unfair competition.
On February 24, 2017, the court entered a scheduling order after discussions with counsel. Since that time, the parties have engaged in non-stop disputes over the adequacy of the pleadings, whether certain pleadings should be stricken, the timing of expert disclosures and other matters that are not directed at moving this case to trial. The court has had enough of this type of skirmishing and believes that this case needs a fresh start. It is therefore
1. By
2. By
3. By
4. By
5. By
6. No written discovery may be served after
7. Discovery ends on
8. Dispositive motions filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 must be filed by
9. All non-dispositive motions must be filed by
10. The parties are cautioned that the court will scrutinize their disclosures when determining if a trial witness has been adequately disclosed to the opposing party. For example, it will
11.
12. Each side will pay its expert any fee required by that expert to prepare for, and attend, his deposition.
13. Each counsel will refrain from disparaging the other.
14. The court is concerned that the disputes between counsel are clouding their judgments on the merits and monetary worth of their respective claims. The parties are
15. All pending non-dispositive motions are
The Clerk shall send copies of this Memorandum, Recommendation and Order to the respective parties who have fourteen days from the receipt thereof to file written objections thereto pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and General Order 2002-13. Failure to file written objections within the time period mentioned shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings and legal conclusions on appeal.
The original of any written objections shall be filed with the United States District Clerk electronically. Copies of such objections shall be mailed to opposing parties and to the chambers of the undersigned, 515 Rusk, Suite 7019, Houston, Texas 77002.