Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gamble v. Davis, H-18-0145. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Texas Number: infdco20180327b11 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM ON DISMISSAL VANESSA D. GILMORE , District Judge . The petitioner has failed to pay a fee of $5.00, as required by the court's order entered February 5, 2018. (Docket Entry No. 5). The order specifically provided that failure to comply as directed may result in the dismissal of this action. The petitioner's failure to pay the filing fee forces this court to conclude that he lacks due diligence. Under the inherent powers necessarily vested in a court to manage its own affairs, th
More

MEMORANDUM ON DISMISSAL

The petitioner has failed to pay a fee of $5.00, as required by the court's order entered February 5, 2018. (Docket Entry No. 5). The order specifically provided that failure to comply as directed may result in the dismissal of this action. The petitioner's failure to pay the filing fee forces this court to conclude that he lacks due diligence.

Under the inherent powers necessarily vested in a court to manage its own affairs, this court determines that dismissal for want of prosecution is appropriate. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626 (1962); Woodson v. Surgitek, Inc., 57 F.3d 1406, 1417 (5th Cir. 1995); 8 J. MOORE, FEDERAL PRACTICE § 41.51(3)(b) & (e) (3d ed. 1998). Upon a proper showing, relief from this order may be granted in accordance with FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b). See Link, 370 U.S. at 635.

This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer