Terry v. City of Houston, Civil Action H-15-2430. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180507448
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRAY H. MILLER , District Judge . Pending before the court are (1) defendants City of Houston, K.D. Fregia, R.C. Haney, R.P. Delasbour, B.R. Penrod, V.G. Zaunbrecher, and Charles McClelland, Jr.'s (collectively, "Defendants") motion for entry of a confidentiality and protective order (Dkt. 29); and (2) Defendants' motion for re-instatement of stay pending the resolution of criminal proceedings (Dkt. 30). The court issued an order requiring plaintiff Jerome Terry to filed a response to
Summary: ORDER GRAY H. MILLER , District Judge . Pending before the court are (1) defendants City of Houston, K.D. Fregia, R.C. Haney, R.P. Delasbour, B.R. Penrod, V.G. Zaunbrecher, and Charles McClelland, Jr.'s (collectively, "Defendants") motion for entry of a confidentiality and protective order (Dkt. 29); and (2) Defendants' motion for re-instatement of stay pending the resolution of criminal proceedings (Dkt. 30). The court issued an order requiring plaintiff Jerome Terry to filed a response to ..
More
ORDER
GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.
Pending before the court are (1) defendants City of Houston, K.D. Fregia, R.C. Haney, R.P. Delasbour, B.R. Penrod, V.G. Zaunbrecher, and Charles McClelland, Jr.'s (collectively, "Defendants") motion for entry of a confidentiality and protective order (Dkt. 29); and (2) Defendants' motion for re-instatement of stay pending the resolution of criminal proceedings (Dkt. 30). The court issued an order requiring plaintiff Jerome Terry to filed a response to these motions no later than noon on Friday, April 27, 2018. Dkt. 31. Terry did not file a response. Under Local Rule 7.4, "[f]ailure to respond will be taken as a representation of no opposition." S.D. Tex. L.R. 7.4. The court therefore deems these motions unopposed. Defendants' motion for a confidentiality and protective order (Dkt. 29) is GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED. Defendants' motion for reinstatement of the stay (Dkt. 30) is likewise GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED. It is therefore ORDERED that this cause of action is STAYED and administratively (statistically) closed. The parties may move to reinstate the case on the court's active docket at such time in the future as deemed appropriate. A copy of this order shall be attached as an exhibit to any motion to reinstate.
Source: Leagle
