Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ramirez v. Berryhill, 3:17-CV-00336. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Texas Number: infdco20180824842 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. , District Judge . On February 22, 2018, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison. Dkt. 6. On July 17, 2018, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 18) recommending that Ramirez's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 8) be GRANTED, Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 16) be DENIED, the decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED, and the case be REMA
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 22, 2018, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison. Dkt. 6. On July 17, 2018, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 18) recommending that Ramirez's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 8) be GRANTED, Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 16) be DENIED, the decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED, and the case be REMANDED for reconsideration in accordance with this opinion and applicable law.

No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; (2) Ramirez's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 8) is GRANTED; (3) Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 16) is DENIED; (4) The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED; and (5) The case is REMANDED for reconsideration in accordance with this opinion and applicable law.

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer