Lomas v. Kwarteng, 2:17-CV-283. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180905c07
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER HILDA TAGLE , Senior District Judge . The Court has received the magistrate judge's July 20, 2018 Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 72. The deadline to object to the M&R has passed, and no objections have been filed. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (setting a 14-day deadline to file objections); Dkt. No. 72 at 8 (advising parties of the 14-day deadline). After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's M&R, Dkt. No. 72.
Summary: ORDER HILDA TAGLE , Senior District Judge . The Court has received the magistrate judge's July 20, 2018 Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 72. The deadline to object to the M&R has passed, and no objections have been filed. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (setting a 14-day deadline to file objections); Dkt. No. 72 at 8 (advising parties of the 14-day deadline). After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's M&R, Dkt. No. 72. ..
More
ORDER
HILDA TAGLE, Senior District Judge.
The Court has received the magistrate judge's July 20, 2018 Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 72. The deadline to object to the M&R has passed, and no objections have been filed. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (setting a 14-day deadline to file objections); Dkt. No. 72 at 8 (advising parties of the 14-day deadline).
After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's M&R, Dkt. No. 72. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief against Defendants Kwarteng, Pickthall, and Rodriguez with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 46, as moot.
Source: Leagle
