U.S. v. Zuniga, 2:18-MJ-3659. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180910c19
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL JASON B. LIBBY , Magistrate Judge . A detention hearing has been held in accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. 3142(f). Detention of the defendant pending trial in this case is necessary because there is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear. The evidence against the defendant meets the probable cause standard. The defendant has a history of non-compliance with court ordered supervision and supervision by Hidal
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL JASON B. LIBBY , Magistrate Judge . A detention hearing has been held in accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. 3142(f). Detention of the defendant pending trial in this case is necessary because there is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear. The evidence against the defendant meets the probable cause standard. The defendant has a history of non-compliance with court ordered supervision and supervision by Hidalg..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
JASON B. LIBBY, Magistrate Judge.
A detention hearing has been held in accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). Detention of the defendant pending trial in this case is necessary because there is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear.
The evidence against the defendant meets the probable cause standard. The defendant has a history of non-compliance with court ordered supervision and supervision by Hidalgo County Child Protection Services. Further, the defendant was on bond at the time of the commission of the instant offense. The findings and conclusions contained in the Pretrial Services Report are adopted and the defendant is ordered detained pending trial.
The defendant is committed to the custody of the United States Marshal or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.
ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
