CVR Energy Inc. v. American Zurich Insurance Company, 4:17-CV-01284. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20181219g19
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENNETH M. HOYT , District Judge . On April 18, 2018, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dena Palermo to conduct all further proceeding pursuant to 28. U.S.C. 636. [Order, DE 38]. Pending before Judge Palermo was the defendant's motion for summary judgment. [DE 45]. On November 27, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R")
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENNETH M. HOYT , District Judge . On April 18, 2018, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dena Palermo to conduct all further proceeding pursuant to 28. U.S.C. 636. [Order, DE 38]. Pending before Judge Palermo was the defendant's motion for summary judgment. [DE 45]. On November 27, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") r..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENNETH M. HOYT, District Judge.
On April 18, 2018, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dena Palermo to conduct all further proceeding pursuant to 28. U.S.C. § 636. [Order, DE 38]. Pending before Judge Palermo was the defendant's motion for summary judgment. [DE 45]. On November 27, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be denied. [DE 63]. Defendants filed objections to the R&R on December 11, 2018. [DE 64].
Having conducted a de novo review of the portions of the R&R to which Defendants have objected, the evidence and briefing submitted in connection with the summary judgment motion, and the objections, the Court fully agrees with Judge Palermo's R&R. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Defendant's objections are OVERRULED.
2. Judge Palermo's R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court.
3. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
