Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Araguz v. Clinton, 1:18-cv-00148. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Texas Number: infdco20190311608 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2019
Summary: AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROLANDO OLVERA , District Judge . Before the Court is the "Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" (hereafter "R&R") (Docket No. 20) in the above-captioned case. No objections were filed. After a de novo review of the record, the Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety and GRANTS the following pleadings: (i) Defendant City of Harlingen, Texas's (hereafter "City") "Motion to Dismiss Defendant Scott Vega" (Docket No
More

AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the "Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" (hereafter "R&R") (Docket No. 20) in the above-captioned case. No objections were filed. After a de novo review of the record, the Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety and GRANTS the following pleadings: (i) Defendant City of Harlingen, Texas's (hereafter "City") "Motion to Dismiss Defendant Scott Vega" (Docket No. 1 Ex. 1 at 50); (ii) the City's "Plea to the Jurisdiction" (Docket No. 1 Ex. 1 at 56); (iii) and the City's "Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings" (Docket No. 4). Thus, the following claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: (i) Plaintiff's state claims against Defendant Scott Vega; (ii) Plaintiff's claim of malicious prosecution against the City; and (iii) Plaintiff's claims against the City's Police Department.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer