Chappell v. Salina, 2:17-CV-374. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190530g84
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 29, 2019
Latest Update: May 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER HILDA TAGLE , Senior District Judge . The Court is in receipt of Defendant R.S. Salina's ("Salina") Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 20; Petitioner's Answer to Government's Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 21; the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 22; and Petitioner's Objections to the M&R, Dkt. No. 23. After independently reviewing t
Summary: ORDER HILDA TAGLE , Senior District Judge . The Court is in receipt of Defendant R.S. Salina's ("Salina") Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 20; Petitioner's Answer to Government's Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 21; the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 22; and Petitioner's Objections to the M&R, Dkt. No. 23. After independently reviewing th..
More
ORDER
HILDA TAGLE, Senior District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of Defendant R.S. Salina's ("Salina") Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 20; Petitioner's Answer to Government's Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 21; the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 22; and Petitioner's Objections to the M&R, Dkt. No. 23.
After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R, Dkt. No. 22.1 The Court GRANTS Respondent's motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 20, and DISMISSES the above-captioned case.
Final Judgment will be entered separately.
FootNotes
1. The Court corrects the docket citation after the following sentence on page one of the M&R: "Respondent filed an answer and a motion for summary judgment on October 3, 2018, to which Petitioner responded on October 15, 2018 (D.E. 14, 15)." The correct docket citation is "(D.E. 20, 21)."
Source: Leagle
