Miller v. Target Corporation, H-19-1539. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190815g07
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRAY H. MILLER , Senior District Judge . Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation by Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson ("M&R"). Dkt. 18. The M&R recommends granting defendant Target Corporation's ("Target") motion for partial dismissal and denying as moot Target's motion for more definite statement (Dkt. 4). Id. at 9. Objections to the M&R were due on August 12, 2019, but no objections have been filed to date. See Dkt. 18. "When no timely objection is filed, th
Summary: ORDER GRAY H. MILLER , Senior District Judge . Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation by Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson ("M&R"). Dkt. 18. The M&R recommends granting defendant Target Corporation's ("Target") motion for partial dismissal and denying as moot Target's motion for more definite statement (Dkt. 4). Id. at 9. Objections to the M&R were due on August 12, 2019, but no objections have been filed to date. See Dkt. 18. "When no timely objection is filed, the..
More
ORDER
GRAY H. MILLER, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation by Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson ("M&R"). Dkt. 18. The M&R recommends granting defendant Target Corporation's ("Target") motion for partial dismissal and denying as moot Target's motion for more definite statement (Dkt. 4). Id. at 9.
Objections to the M&R were due on August 12, 2019, but no objections have been filed to date. See Dkt. 18. "When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Comm. Note (1983). The court, having reviewed the motion, M&R, and applicable law, and having received no objections, finds no clear error. Thus, the court ADOPTS IN FULL the M&R (Dkt. 18). For the reasons stated in the M&R, Target's motion for partial dismissal is GRANTED, and Target's motion for more definite statement is DENIED AS MOOT (Dkt. 4).
Source: Leagle
