Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ren v. University of Houston at Victoria., H-17-444. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Texas Number: infdco20190820g78 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRAY H. MILLER , Senior District Judge . Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation by Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson ("M&R"). Dkt. 50. The M&R recommends granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 40). Objections to the M&R were due on August 15, 2019, but the parties have not filed any objections to date. See Dkt. 50. "When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in ord
More

ORDER

Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation by Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson ("M&R"). Dkt. 50. The M&R recommends granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 40).

Objections to the M&R were due on August 15, 2019, but the parties have not filed any objections to date. See Dkt. 50. "When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Comm. Note (1983). The court, having reviewed the motion, M&R, record evidence, and applicable law, and having received no objections, finds no clear error. Thus, the court ADOPTS IN FULL the M&R (Dkt. 50). For the reasons stated in the M&R, Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 40) is GRANTED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer