Hill v. Davis, 2:18-CV-230. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190821f41
Visitors: 27
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER HILDA TAGLE , Senior District Judge . The Court is in receipt of the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 20, and Plaintiff Charles Ray Hill's ("Hill") Objections to the M&R, Dkt. No. 25. After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R, Dkt. No. 20. Accordingly, the Court RETAINS Plaintiff Charles Ray Hill's ("Hills") equal protection claim against TDCJ Director Lorie Davis ("Davis") in her official capacity for
Summary: ORDER HILDA TAGLE , Senior District Judge . The Court is in receipt of the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 20, and Plaintiff Charles Ray Hill's ("Hill") Objections to the M&R, Dkt. No. 25. After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R, Dkt. No. 20. Accordingly, the Court RETAINS Plaintiff Charles Ray Hill's ("Hills") equal protection claim against TDCJ Director Lorie Davis ("Davis") in her official capacity for ..
More
ORDER
HILDA TAGLE, Senior District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 20, and Plaintiff Charles Ray Hill's ("Hill") Objections to the M&R, Dkt. No. 25.
After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R, Dkt. No. 20. Accordingly, the Court RETAINS Plaintiff Charles Ray Hill's ("Hills") equal protection claim against TDCJ Director Lorie Davis ("Davis") in her official capacity for injunctive and declaratory relief. The Court DISMISSES the remaining claims and the claims against Defendant White for failure to state a claim and/or as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1).
Source: Leagle
