Cola v. Dow Chemical Company, 3:19-CV-00199. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20191101e75
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION JEFFREY V. BROWN , District Judge . On August 30, 2019, Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Memorandum of Law in Support ("Dkt. 14) was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison for report and recommendation. See Dkt. 18. On October 1, 2019, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 32) recommending that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Memorandum of Law in Support (Dkt. 14) be GRANTED. On Oct
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION JEFFREY V. BROWN , District Judge . On August 30, 2019, Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Memorandum of Law in Support ("Dkt. 14) was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison for report and recommendation. See Dkt. 18. On October 1, 2019, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 32) recommending that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Memorandum of Law in Support (Dkt. 14) be GRANTED. On Octo..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
JEFFREY V. BROWN, District Judge.
On August 30, 2019, Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Memorandum of Law in Support ("Dkt. 14) was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison for report and recommendation. See Dkt. 18. On October 1, 2019, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 32) recommending that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Memorandum of Law in Support (Dkt. 14) be GRANTED.
On October 15, 2019, Defendants filed their Objections. See Dkt. 39. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection [has been] made." After conducting this de novo review, the Court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id.; see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
The Court has carefully considered the Objections; the Memorandum and Recommendation; the pleadings; and the record. The Court ACCEPTS Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that:
(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 32) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court;
(2) Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Memorandum of Law in Support ("Dkt. 14) is GRANTED;
(3) This action, originally numbered 98403-CV by the Brazoria County District Clerk, is REMANDED back to the 149th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, effective immediately; and
(4) A certified copy of this order will be mailed by the Clerk of this Court to the Clerk of the 149th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas entitling that Court to proceed with the action according to the laws of the State of Texas.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
