Scott v. Kwarteng, 2:17-CV-382. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20200220h06
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2020
Summary: ORDER HILDA TAGLE , Senior District Judge . The Court is in receipt of the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") to grant Defendant Senior Warden Philip Sifuentes's ("Sifuentes") Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 68. Plaintiff Kenneth Scott ("Scott") did not oppose the motion or file objections to the M&R. See id at 13; 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (setting a 14-day deadline to file objections; FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2) (same). After independently reviewing the record and
Summary: ORDER HILDA TAGLE , Senior District Judge . The Court is in receipt of the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") to grant Defendant Senior Warden Philip Sifuentes's ("Sifuentes") Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 68. Plaintiff Kenneth Scott ("Scott") did not oppose the motion or file objections to the M&R. See id at 13; 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (setting a 14-day deadline to file objections; FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2) (same). After independently reviewing the record and c..
More
ORDER
HILDA TAGLE, Senior District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") to grant Defendant Senior Warden Philip Sifuentes's ("Sifuentes") Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 68. Plaintiff Kenneth Scott ("Scott") did not oppose the motion or file objections to the M&R. See id at 13; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (setting a 14-day deadline to file objections; FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2) (same). After independently reviewing the record and considering the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety, Dkt. No. 68.
The Court hereby: GRANTS Sifuentes's Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 62, and DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against Sifuentes with prejudice for failure to exhaust.
Source: Leagle
