Filed: Mar. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRAY H. MILLER , Senior District Judge . Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson ("M&R"). Dkt. 98. The M&R recommends denying defendant Michael Watts's ("Watts") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 50), denying the plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 63), denying Watts's motion to strike (Dkt. 86), and overruling Watt's objection to the admissibility of Watt's deposition (
Summary: ORDER GRAY H. MILLER , Senior District Judge . Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson ("M&R"). Dkt. 98. The M&R recommends denying defendant Michael Watts's ("Watts") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 50), denying the plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 63), denying Watts's motion to strike (Dkt. 86), and overruling Watt's objection to the admissibility of Watt's deposition (D..
More
ORDER
GRAY H. MILLER, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson ("M&R"). Dkt. 98. The M&R recommends denying defendant Michael Watts's ("Watts") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 50), denying the plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 63), denying Watts's motion to strike (Dkt. 86), and overruling Watt's objection to the admissibility of Watt's deposition (Dkt. 87). Id.
Objections to the M&R were due on March 11, 2020. Neither party filed timely objections. "When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Comm. Note (1983). The court, having reviewed the motions, M&R, pleadings, and applicable law, and having received no objections, finds no clear error. Thus, the court ADOPTS IN FULL the M&R (Dkt. 98).
For the reasons stated in the M&R, Watts's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 50), SEC's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 63), and Watts's motion to strike (Dkt. 86) are all DENIED. Additionally, Watt's objection to the admissibility of Watt's deposition (Dkt. 87) is OVERRULED.
