Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Now Word Covenant Church v. State Farm Lloyds, SA-19-CV-00261-FB. (2020)

Court: District Court, W.D. Texas Number: infdco20200122i49 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2020
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Extend Defendant's Expert Designation Deadline (docket #34). Defendant asks the Court to extend the January 24, 2020 deadline to designate two of its testifying experts and to serve the materials required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) in accordance with the parties' agreement until specified periods of time after Plaintiff produces relevant information it has agreed to produce. The Court
More

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Extend Defendant's Expert Designation Deadline (docket #34). Defendant asks the Court to extend the January 24, 2020 deadline to designate two of its testifying experts and to serve the materials required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) in accordance with the parties' agreement until specified periods of time after Plaintiff produces relevant information it has agreed to produce. The Court finds that the motion has merit and should be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Extend Defendant's Expert Designation Deadline (docket #34) is GRANTED such that the Scheduling Order filed June 6, 2019 (docket #7) is amended as follows:

1. Defendant's deadline to file its designation of Alan Berryhill as a testifying expert and to serve on Plaintiff the materials required by FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(2)(B) shall be one (1) week after the deposition of Plaintiff's testifying expert Tom Irmiter. 2. Defendant's deadline to file its designation of its testifying expert on attorney's fees and to serve on Plaintiff the materials required by FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(2)(B) shall be two (2) weeks after Plaintiff produces its Power of Attorney provided to counsel (or other agreement with its counsel) and existing counsel time sheets to Defendant.

Except for the changes indicated above and previous Orders of the Court, the Scheduling Order filed June 6, 2019 (docket #7) remains is effect as issued.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer