In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                            OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

********************** *
DONALD R. MASIAS,         *                      No. 99-697V
                          *                      Senior Judge Robert H. Hodges, Jr.
              Petitioner, *                      Special Master Christian J. Moran
                          *
v.                        *                      Filed: May 14, 2013
                          *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH       *                      Attorneys’ fees and costs; reasonable
AND HUMAN SERVICES,       *                      hourly rate; reasonable number of
                          *                      hours; supplemental request
              Respondent. *
********************** *

Robert T. Moxley, Esq., Robert T. Moxley, P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming, for Petitioner;
Catharine Reeves, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

            PUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES ON
           THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES*

        After approximately seven years of litigation devoted to attorneys’ fees, this case
appears ready to conclude. Mr. Masias filed his third supplemental request for attorneys’
fees, seeking compensation for 35 hours of attorney work at $300 per hour. The total
request is $10,500. Exhibit 100.

       The Secretary opposes the request, in part. The Secretary argues that the number
of hours requested for certain activities is unreasonable and the hourly rate is not
supported.

      Because the Secretary’s objections are valid, the amount requested is reduced to a
reasonable amount. The total awarded is $8,384.


       *
         The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913
(Dec. 17, 2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to
Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of
medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any
redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the
website.
                                      DISCUSSION

        The Federal Circuit reviewed how to determine a reasonable amount of attorneys’
fees in Avera v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 

(Fed. Cir. 2008), where
it endorsed the lodestar method. Pursuant to this approach, “a court first determines an
initial estimate of a reasonable attorneys’ fee by multiplying the number of hours
reasonably expended on the litigation times a reasonable hourly rate.” 

this preliminary determination, the court “may then make an upward or downward
departure to the fee award based on other specific findings.” 

citation omitted).

        A reasonable hourly rate for Mr. Masias’s attorney has been discussed in previous
adjudications in this case. Most recently, the undersigned found that a reasonable hourly
rate for Mr. Moxley’s work in 2011 was $257.00. Masias v. Sec’y of Health & Human
Servs., No. 99-697V, 

, at *4 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 31, 2013).

      This rate needs to be adjusted for inflation. According to data released by the state
of Wyoming, the rate of inflation for Wyoming in 2012 was 2.1 percent. Consequently, a
reasonable hourly rate for Mr. Moxley in 2012 is $262.00 ($257 x 1.021 = $262.40).

       The second variable in the lodestar formula is the reasonable number of hours.
The pending invoice covers work performed in 2012, primarily on a motion seeking
correction of clerical errors pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of the Court of Federal
Claims and a motion seeking review of a fees adjudication. The total amount of time
requested is 35 hours. Exhibit 100.

       The Secretary argues that the amount of time spent on some activities, such as an
attorney spending 0.3 hours (or 18 minutes) downloading a one page order, was
excessive. The Secretary’s objections are persuasive. Consequently, the number of
hours is reduced from 35 to 32.

       The ensuing lodestar calculation shows that the presumptively reasonable amount
is $8,384 ($262 x 32). There is no basis to depart from this number.

                                     CONCLUSION

       Accordingly, petitioner is awarded an additional $8,384.00 in attorneys’ fees
in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Robert
T. Moxley.




                                             2
        In the absence of a motion for review filed under RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is
directed to enter judgment according to this order.1 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 28.1, the
clerk is instructed to provide a copy of this decision to the presiding judge.

      IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                s/Christian J. Moran
                                                Christian J. Moran
                                                Special Master




      1
          Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by
filing a joint notice renouncing the right to seek review.

                                            3