In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                              OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                   Filed: June 11, 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * *                  *
The Estate of V.C., by                     *       UNPUBLISHED
her parents and personal representatives,  *
DANIEL and STEPHANIE CHRISTNER             *       No. 11-74V
                                           *
               Petitioners,                *
                                           *       Special Master Dorsey
 v.                                        *
                                           *       Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;
 SECRETARY OF HEALTH                       *       Reasonable Amount Requested to which
 AND HUMAN SERVICES,                       *       Respondent Does not Object.
                                           *
               Respondent.                 *
                                           *
 * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Clifford John Shoemaker, Shoemaker and Associates, Vienna, VA, for petitioners.
Michael Patrick Milmoe, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

                      ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DECISION 1

       On February 4, 2011, Daniel and Stephanie Christner (“petitioners”) filed a petition
pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34
(2006). Petitioners alleged that their daughter, Victoria, died due to Sudden Infant Death
Syndrome (SIDS) as a result of the administration of the haemophilus influenzae B (Hib),
diphtheria tetanus acellular pertussis (Dtap), RotaVirus, pneumococcal conjugate, and polio


1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which
to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or
commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes
medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the entire decision will be available to the
public. 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.

                                                1
vaccines on October 22, 2008, and December 23, 2008. Petition at ¶¶ 5, 6. On October 11,
2013, the undersigned entered a decision dismissing the petition for insufficient proof.

        On June 10, 2014, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Attorneys’ Fees and
Costs. According to the stipulation, the parties stipulate to an award to petitioners of attorneys’
fees and costs in the amount of $34,100.00. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioners’
counsel represents that petitioners have personally $378.02, in reimbursable costs in pursuit of
their claim.

        The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. §
300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of the parties’ stipulation, the undersigned GRANTS
the request for approval and payment of attorneys’ fees and costs.

       Accordingly, an award should be made as follows:

           (1) in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioners and to Mr. Clifford
               Shoemaker of the law firm of Shoemaker, Gentry & Knickelbein, in the amount
               of $34,100.00, and

           (2) in the form of a check payable to petitioners only in the amount of $378.02.

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation. 3

        IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                              s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                              Nora Beth Dorsey
                                              Special Master




3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                 2