Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PACE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 13-1007V. (2014)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20140721769 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2014
Summary: DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY, Special Master. On December 19, 2013, Raithe Pace ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program 2 alleging that she suffered from a left shoulder injury that had been caused-in-fact by an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered to her on September 24, 2011. Petition at 1. On June 3, 2014, a Ruling on Entitlement was issued based on respondent's concession. On June 25, 2014, respondent fil
More

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

NORA BETH DORSEY, Special Master.

On December 19, 2013, Raithe Pace ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program2 alleging that she suffered from a left shoulder injury that had been caused-in-fact by an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered to her on September 24, 2011. Petition at 1. On June 3, 2014, a Ruling on Entitlement was issued based on respondent's concession.

On June 25, 2014, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation. Respondent proffers that, based upon her review of the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded $95,000.00. Respondent states that petitioner agrees with the amount set forth in the Proffer.

Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner:

A lump sum payment of $95,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Raithe Pace. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be entitled.

Proffer ¶ II.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items

Respondent proffers that, based on the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded $95,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1); 15(a)(3)(A); and 15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below, and request that the special master's decision and the Court's judgment award the following:1

A. A lump sum payment of $95,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Raithe Pace. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be entitled.

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted, STUART F. DELERY Assistant Attorney General RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALTHEA W. DAVIS Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division TRACI R. PATTON Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 146 Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel.: (202) 353-1589 DATE: June 25, 2014

FootNotes


1. Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned's action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction "of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy." Vaccine Rule 18(b).
2. The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter "Vaccine Act" or "the Act"). Hereafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act.
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses and future pain and suffering.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer