Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rittiner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 13-81 (2014)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 13-81 Visitors: 1
Judges: Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
Filed: Dec. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-081V Filed: November 18, 2014 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED MICHAEL PARKER RITTINER, * * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman Petitioner, * * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; v. * Reasonable Amount Requested to * Which Respondent Does Not Object. SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Nancy R. Meyers, Ward Black Law, Greensboro, NC, for Petitioner. Jennifer L. Re
More
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 13-081V
                                    Filed: November 18, 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                               UNPUBLISHED
MICHAEL PARKER RITTINER,      *
                              *                               Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman
          Petitioner,         *
                              *                               Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;
v.                            *                               Reasonable Amount Requested to
                              *                               Which Respondent Does Not Object.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH           *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,           *
                              *
          Respondent.         *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nancy R. Meyers, Ward Black Law, Greensboro, NC, for Petitioner.
Jennifer L. Reynaud, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

                                            DECISION1

        On January 30, 2013, Michael Parker Rittiner (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to
the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq. (2006)
(“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered from fatigue, loss of appetite, difficulty
concentrating, and nausea, and that this injury had been caused by the H1N1 vaccine received on
December 17, 2009 and the Trivalent Influenza vaccine received on January 22, 2010. Petition
(“Pet”) at 1-4. On September 25, 2014, the undersigned issued a decision dismissing the

1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116
Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by
Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b).
2
  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.


                                                  1
petition.

         On November 17, 2014, the parties filed a Stipulation of Fact Concerning Final
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. This stipulation requests a total payment of $26,000.00, representing
total attorneys’ fees and costs. In compliance with General Order #9, Petitioner represents that
no personal, out-of-pocket expenses were incurred in proceeding on the petition.

       The undersigned finds that the petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a
reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and
appropriate. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the amount of $26,000.00, in the
form of a check made payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Nancy R.
Meyers.

         In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation.

        IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                             s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                             Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                             Special Master




                                                2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer