DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

NORA BETH DORSEY, Special Master.

On June 30, 2014, Annette Terry ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ("the Program")2 alleging that she suffered from a shoulder injury that had been caused-in-fact by an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered to her on October 10, 2013. See Petition at 1. On August 22, 2014, a Ruling on Entitlement was issued based on respondent's concession.

On August 27, 2014, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation. Respondent proffers that, based upon her review of the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded $80,000.00. Respondent states that petitioner agrees with the amounts set forth in the Proffer. See Proffer at 1.

Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards the following:

A lump sum payment of $80,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

Proffer ¶ II.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Procedural History

On June 30, 2014, Annette Terry ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the "Vaccine Act"), as amended. 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq. Petitioner alleges that, as a result of receiving the influenza ("flu") vaccine on October 10, 2013, she suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") in her left shoulder and arm. Petitioner alleges a theory based on causation-in-fact.

On August 21, 2014, respondent filed her Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, conceding causation-in-fact for petitioner's SIRVA. On August 22, 2014, the Special Master issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation for a SIRVA caused by the flu vaccine.

II. Items of Compensation

Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $80,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

III. Form of the Award

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $80,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1 Petitioner agrees.