Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gopichand v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 13-562 (2015)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 13-562 Visitors: 4
Judges: Laura D Millman
Filed: May 13, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-562V Filed: April 22, 2015 Not for Publication ************************************* ISHWAR GOPICHAND and PENNY * GOPICHAND, as Parents and Guardian * Ad Litem of C.K.G., * * Petitioners, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on * stipulation of fact v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* Peter J. Sarda, Raleigh, NC, for petitioners. Julia W. McIn
More
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-562V Filed: April 22, 2015 Not for Publication ************************************* ISHWAR GOPICHAND and PENNY * GOPICHAND, as Parents and Guardian * Ad Litem of C.K.G., * * Petitioners, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on * stipulation of fact v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* Peter J. Sarda, Raleigh, NC, for petitioners. Julia W. McInerny, Washington, DC, for respondent. MILLMAN, Special Master DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1 On April 22, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. Petitioners submitted their request for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent, requesting reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $26,472.30, consisting of $26,072.30 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access. in attorneys’ fees and costs and $400.00 in petitioners’ costs. Respondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards: a. $26,072.30, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners and Creech Law Firm, P.A. in the amount of $26,072.30; and b. $400.00, representing reimbursement for petitioners’ costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable to petitioners in the amount of $400.00. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 22, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer