Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Odom v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 13-865 (2015)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 13-865 Visitors: 9
Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey
Filed: Sep. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: August 25, 2015 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED RONDA ODOM, * No. 13-865v * Petitioner, * Special Master Dorsey * v. * * Attorney’s Fees and Costs; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Reasonable Amount Requested to which AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Respondent Does not Object. * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * John Robert Howie, Jr., Howie Law, P.C., Dallas, TX, for petitioner. Claudia Barnes Gangi, United States Departme
More
                 In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                        Filed: August 25, 2015

* * * * * * *             *     *   *   *   *   * *       UNPUBLISHED
RONDA ODOM,                                       *       No. 13-865v
                                                  *
                  Petitioner,                     *       Special Master Dorsey
                                                  *
v.                                                *
                                                  *       Attorney’s Fees and Costs;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                               *       Reasonable Amount Requested to which
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                               *       Respondent Does not Object.
                                                  *
                  Respondent.                     *
                                                  *
*    *   *   *    *   *   *     *   *   *   *   * *

John Robert Howie, Jr., Howie Law, P.C., Dallas, TX, for petitioner.
Claudia Barnes Gangi, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                          ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS DECISION1

       On November 1, 2013, Ronda Odom (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34
(2006). Petitioner alleged that she suffered pain in her left shoulder secondary to a Diphtheria-
Tetanus-acellular Pertussis (“DTaP”) vaccine that she received in her left arm on August 30,
2012. See Petition at 1. On May 21, 2015, the undersigned entered a decision awarding
compensation to petitioner based on a proffer filed by respondent.


1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which
to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or
commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes
medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the entire decision will be available to the
public. 
Id. 2 The
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.

                                                      1
        On August 21, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Attorneys’ Fees
and Costs. According to the stipulation, the parties stipulate to a total award to petitioner of
attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $42,743.39. In accordance with General Order #9,
petitioner’s counsel states that petitioner did not advance any reimbursable costs in pursuit of this
claim.

       The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. §
300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request and the lack of any objection
by respondent, the undersigned GRANTS the request for approval and payment of attorney’s
fees and costs.

       Accordingly, an award should be made as follows:

       in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney, John R.
       Howie, Jr., of the law firm of Howie Law, P.C., in the amount of $42,743.39.

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation.3

        IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                               s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                               Nora Beth Dorsey
                                               Special Master




3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                 2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer