In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                            OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 14-227V
                                      Filed: March 4, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                              UNPUBLISHED
KRYSTYN SNYDER,               *
                              *                              Special Master Gowen
          Petitioner,         *
                              *                              Joint Stipulation;
v.                            *                              Attorneys’ Fees and Costs.
                              *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH           *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,           *
                              *
          Respondent.         *
                              *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Jeffrey A. Golvash, Brennan, Robins & Daley, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for petitioner.
Glenn A. MacLeod, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                    DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

         On March 25, 2014, Krystyn Snyder (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged
that as a result of receiving a Tetanus-diptheria-acellular-pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine on December
22, 2012, she developed Brachial Neuritis (“BN”). Petition ¶¶ 3, 9. On November 7, 2014,
respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report [‘Respondent’s Report”] in which she conceded that petitioner
is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Report at 2. The undersigned issued a


1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat.
2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule
18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by
that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or
confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).
2
  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.


                                                1
decision awarding damages on November 10, 2014.

        On March 4, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation concerning attorneys’ fees and costs.
Petitioner requests a total award of attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $11,500.00.
Stipulation at ¶ 4. Respondent does not object to this amount. 

with General Order
#9, petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner did not incur personal costs in pursuit of this
claim. 

Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300
aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s motion, the undersigned GRANTS the
request for approval and payment of attorneys’ fees and costs.

       Accordingly, an award should be made as follows:

       in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney, Jeffrey
       A. Golvash, of Brennan, Robins & Daley, P.C., in the amount of $11,500.00.

       In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance herewith.3

       IT IS SO ORDERED.


                                             s/ Thomas L. Gowen
                                             Thomas L. Gowen
                                             Special Master




3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                2