Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nunez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 14-863 (2015)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 14-863 Visitors: 3
Judges: Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
Filed: Sep. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-863V Filed: September 4, 2015 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED JORDIA NUNEZ and JOHN DIAZ, as legal * representatives of J.J.D., an infant, deceased, * * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman Petitioner, * * Decision on Interim Attorneys’ Fees v. * and Costs; Reasonable Amount * Requested to Which Respondent SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Does Not Object. AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
More
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                            No. 14-863V
                                     Filed: September 4, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                            UNPUBLISHED
JORDIA NUNEZ and JOHN DIAZ, as legal *
representatives of J.J.D., an infant, deceased, *
                                                *          Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman
               Petitioner,                      *
                                                *          Decision on Interim Attorneys’ Fees
v.                                              *          and Costs; Reasonable Amount
                                                *          Requested to Which Respondent
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                             *          Does Not Object.
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                             *
                                                *
               Respondent.                      *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mindy Michaels Roth, Britcher, Leone & Roth, LLC, Glen Rock, NJ, for Petitioners.
Adriana Teitel, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                                            DECISION 1

        On September 17, 2014, Jordia Nunez and John Diaz (“Petitioners”) filed a petition on
behalf their deceased minor child, J.J.D., pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program. 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioners alleged that J.J.D. died as a result of
the administration of Hepatitis B, Rotavirus, DTaP, HiB, IPV, and Pneumococcal vaccines on
November 14, 2012.

       On September 4, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of fact stating that they had agreed

1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116
Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by
Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b).
2
  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.

                                                  1
on a reasonable amount of attorneys’ fees and costs to have been incurred by Petitioners’ counsel
to date. Respondent maintains her objection to any award of interim attorneys’ fees and costs.
Nevertheless, the parties agree to the reasonableness of the revised total of interim attorneys’
fees and costs as set forth in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the joint stipulation.

        The undersigned finds that Petitioners are entitled to an award of interim attorney’s fees
and costs under the unique facts and circumstances of this case. See Butler v. Sec’y, HHS, No.
02-1051, 
2012 WL 4458203
(Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. June 25, 2012) (awarding interim attorneys’
fees and costs over respondent’s objection); Shaw v. Sec’y, HHS, 
609 F.3d 1372
, 1375 (Fed. Cr.
2010) (holding that “[w]here the claimant establishes that the cost of litigation has imposed an
undue hardship and that there exists a good faith basis for the claim, it is proper for the special
master to award interim attorneys’ fees”). The undersigned finds that paragraphs 3 and 4 of the
stipulation are reasonable and adopts them as the decision of the Court in awarding interim fees
and costs, on the terms set forth therein.

       Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the total of $12,000.00 issued in the
form of a check payable jointly to Petitioners and Petitioners’ attorney, Mindy Michaels
Roth, for interim attorneys’ fees and costs.

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                              s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                              Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                              Special Master




3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                 2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer